AutoMapper:映射到来自多个源属性的集合
本文关键字:属性 集合 映射 AutoMapper | 更新日期: 2023-09-27 18:15:17
2018年4月13日更新: Automapper 6.1.0通过引入ReverseMap
支持非扁平化。见发行说明这里
我正在尝试使用AutoMapper来平展一个对象。
我有一个来源如下
public class Source
{
public string Name {get;set;}
public string Child1Property1 {get;set;}
public string Child1Property2 {get;set;}
public string Child2Property1 {get;set;}
public string Child2Property2 {get;set;}
}
我想把这个映射到目的地
public class Destination
{
public string Name {get;set;}
public List<Child> Children {get;set;}
}
public class Child
{
public string Property1 {get;set;}
public string Property2 {get;set;}
}
我的映射配置
public static class AutoMapperConfiguration
{
public static MapperConfiguration Configure()
{
var config = new MapperConfiguration(
cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Destination>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.Children, /* What do I put here?*/))
// I don't think this is correct
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Child>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.Property1, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Child1Property1))
.ForMember(dest => dest.Property2, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Child1Property2))
.ForMember(dest => dest.Property1, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Child2Property1))
.ForMember(dest => dest.Property2, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Child2Property2));
});
return config;
}
}
现在,当我测试我的代码时,我使用mapper.Map<List<Child>>(source)
,我得到一个AutoMapperMappingException: Missing type map configuration or unsupported mapping.
,这是有意义的,因为没有一个映射配置到List<Child>
。如果我做mapper.Map<Child>(source)
,我得到一个Child
实例与所有null
值的属性。
不幸的是,我不能修改Source
类。
这在AutoMapper中是可能的吗?如果是,那又是怎么回事呢?
至少有2个选项。您可以使用简单的扩展方法来简化映射,也可以创建自定义类型转换器。
public class ConvertSourceToDestination : ITypeConverter<Source, Destination>
{
public Destination Convert(Source source, Destination destination, ResolutionContext context)
{
destination = destination ?? new Destination();
destination.Children = destination.Children ?? new List<Child>();
destination.Children.Add(new Child() { Property1 = source.Child1Property1, Property2 = source.Child1Property2 });
destination.Children.Add(new Child() { Property1 = source.Child2Property1, Property2 = source.Child2Property2 });
destination.Name = source.Name;
return destination;
}
}
public static class SourceExtension
{
public static IEnumerable<Child> Children(this Source source)
{
yield return new Child() { Property1 = source.Child1Property1, Property2 = source.Child1Property2 };
yield return new Child() { Property1 = source.Child2Property1, Property2 = source.Child2Property2 };
}
public static MapperConfiguration CreateMapping()
{
var config = new MapperConfiguration(
cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Destination>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.Children, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Children()));
});
return config;
}
public static MapperConfiguration CreateMapping2()
{
var config = new MapperConfiguration(
cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Destination>().ConvertUsing(new ConvertSourceToDestination());
});
return config;
}
}
您可以在Source类中添加一个方法来获取子列表。这样就很容易映射了
与其使用自定义类型转换器,不如使用自定义值解析器,并将其余的映射留给AutoMapper。在这种情况下,将source.Name
映射到destination.Name
并不困难,但是假设您有10个AutoMapper可以处理的其他属性,或者您可以使用默认的opt.MapFrom
。
自定义值解析器示例:
public class SourceToDestinationChildResolver : IValueResolver<Source, Destination, List<Child>>
{
public List<Child> Resolve(Source source, Destination destination, List<Child> member, ResolutionContext context)
{
destination = destination ?? new Destination();
destination.Children = destination.Children ?? new List<Child>();
destination.Children.Add(new Child() { Property1 = source.Child1Property1, Property2 = source.Child1Property2 });
destination.Children.Add(new Child() { Property1 = source.Child2Property1, Property2 = source.Child2Property2 });
// This is not needed then
// destination.Name = source.Name;
return destination.Children;
}
}
使用解析器的配置:
public static class AutoMapperConfiguration
{
public static MapperConfiguration Configure()
{
var config = new MapperConfiguration(
cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Destination>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.Children, opt => opt.MapFrom<SourceToDestinationChildResolver>())
});
return config;
}
}
有一件事可以帮助澄清我自己的解决方案是如何使用List<Child> member
。在文档中我不清楚,所以请有人评论:)