首先使用实体框架代码实现存储库的泛型方法
本文关键字:存储 实现 泛型方法 代码 框架 实体 | 更新日期: 2023-09-27 18:15:33
我使用Entity Framework 4.1
和repository pattern
。
我正在尝试创建将在大多数情况下使用的方法。我正在尝试创建一种方法,带回记录并根据提供的订单标准对其进行排序。它可以按1、2或3列排序。我希望这个是指定的。我在Orchard framework
中发现了以下代码。
在IRepository interface
中,他们有以下方法(我省略了其他方法):
public interface IRepository<T>
{
IEnumerable<T> Fetch(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate);
IEnumerable<T> Fetch(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate, Action<Orderable<T>> order);
}
IEnumerable<T> Fetch(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate, Action<Orderable<T>> order);
的实现是:
public class Repository<T> : IRepository<T>
{
public virtual IQueryable<T> Fetch(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate)
{
return Table.Where(predicate);
}
public virtual IQueryable<T> Fetch(Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate, Action<Orderable<T>> order)
{
var orderable = new Orderable<T>(Fetch(predicate));
order(orderable);
return orderable.Queryable;
}
}
Orderable class
:
public class Orderable<T>
{
private IQueryable<T> _queryable;
public Orderable(IQueryable<T> enumerable)
{
_queryable = enumerable;
}
public IQueryable<T> Queryable
{
get { return _queryable; }
}
public Orderable<T> Asc<TKey>(Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector)
{
_queryable = _queryable
.OrderBy(keySelector);
return this;
}
public Orderable<T> Asc<TKey1, TKey2>(Expression<Func<T, TKey1>> keySelector1,
Expression<Func<T, TKey2>> keySelector2)
{
_queryable = _queryable
.OrderBy(keySelector1)
.OrderBy(keySelector2);
return this;
}
public Orderable<T> Asc<TKey1, TKey2, TKey3>(Expression<Func<T, TKey1>> keySelector1,
Expression<Func<T, TKey2>> keySelector2,
Expression<Func<T, TKey3>> keySelector3)
{
_queryable = _queryable
.OrderBy(keySelector1)
.OrderBy(keySelector2)
.OrderBy(keySelector3);
return this;
}
public Orderable<T> Desc<TKey>(Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector)
{
_queryable = _queryable
.OrderByDescending(keySelector);
return this;
}
public Orderable<T> Desc<TKey1, TKey2>(Expression<Func<T, TKey1>> keySelector1,
Expression<Func<T, TKey2>> keySelector2)
{
_queryable = _queryable
.OrderByDescending(keySelector1)
.OrderByDescending(keySelector2);
return this;
}
public Orderable<T> Desc<TKey1, TKey2, TKey3>(Expression<Func<T, TKey1>> keySelector1,
Expression<Func<T, TKey2>> keySelector2,
Expression<Func<T, TKey3>> keySelector3)
{
_queryable = _queryable
.OrderByDescending(keySelector1)
.OrderByDescending(keySelector2)
.OrderByDescending(keySelector3);
return this;
}
}
可以这样使用:
var foos = _fooRepos.Fetch(
f => f.Name == "two" || f.Name == "three",
o => o.Asc(f => f.Name, f => f.Id)
);
这是我想要达到的最好的方法吗?我正试图使它尽可能简单。我将感谢所有的帮助,如果有任何示例代码和文章。
我相信Orchard的家伙有他们的理由(没有看过代码库),但我只是想知道它带来的表与一个更"标准"的基于LINQ/iqueryable的解决方案相比?
public interface IRepository<T>
{
IQueryable<T> All();
}
用法:
var foos = from f in _foosRepos.All()
where f.Name == "two" || f.Name == "three"
orderby f.Name, f.Id;
或
var foos = _foosRepos.All()
.Where(f => f.Name == "two" || f.Name == "three")
.OrderBy(f => f.Name).ThenBy(f => f.Id);
既然您提到项目可以按1、2或3个字段排序,那么您可以扩展jeroenh的响应,并将其与Orchard的逻辑"合并":
public interface IRepository<T>
{
IQueryable<T> All();
IQueryable<T> Sorted(Func<T, object> sort1, Func<T, object> sort2 = null, Func<T, object> sort3 = null);
}
public class Repository<T> : IRepository<T>
{
public IQueryable<T> All()
{
// TODO: Implement real data retrieval
return new List<T>().AsQueryable();
}
public IQueryable<T> Sorted(Func<T, object> sort1, Func<T, object> sort2 = null, Func<T, object> sort3 = null)
{
var list = All();
var res = list.OrderBy(sort1);
if (sort2 != null)
res = res.ThenBy(sort2);
if (sort3 != null)
res = res.ThenBy(sort3);
return res.AsQueryable();
}
}
请参阅允许您在本教程中指定订单标准的通用存储库实现:http://www.asp.net/entity-framework/tutorials/implementing-the-repository-and-unit-of-work-patterns-in-an-asp-net-mvc-application