添加第二个DatagridViewRow会导致克隆
本文关键字:第二个 DatagridViewRow 添加 | 更新日期: 2023-09-27 18:19:41
我遇到了一个有趣的问题。当我只向DataGridView添加一个DataGridViewRow时,一切都如预期:DataGridView。Rows[0]是添加的行。当我以某种方式添加第二个DataGridviewRow时,实际的DataGridviewRow将不再添加,而是添加克隆。看起来完全相同但实际上不是同一对象的克隆。
所以我想知道的是为什么会这样,这种行为来自哪里,如果可能的话,如何阻止添加克隆而不是实际的行。我查看了带有Reflector的DataGridViewRowCollection的代码,但没有发现任何可疑之处,但也许我遗漏了一些东西。
下面是一个复制问题的代码示例:
DataGridView dgv = new DataGridView { AllowUserToAddRows = false };
DataGridViewTextBoxColumn dgColumn = new DataGridViewTextBoxColumn();
dgv.Columns.Add(dgColumn);
DataGridViewRow drFirst = new DataGridViewRow();
dgv.Rows.Add(drFirst); // Comment this line to showcase the problem
DataGridViewRow drSecond = new DataGridViewRow();
drSecond.Tag = new object();
dgv.Rows.Add(drSecond);
// When drFirst is added this is false - when it isn't this is true (as it should always be?)
bool thisSeemsWrong = object.ReferenceEquals(dgv.Rows[dgv.Rows.Count - 1], drSecond);
// Always true
bool thisSeemsRight = object.ReferenceEquals(dgv.Rows[dgv.Rows.Count - 1].Tag, drSecond.Tag);
类DataGridViewRowCollection
的Item属性创建GridViewRow
的克隆并返回该克隆,因此当存在多行时,ReferenceEquals
应始终为false
。
DataGridViewRow row2 = (DataGridViewRow) dataGridViewRow.Clone();
但如果只有一行和index=0
,则返回相同的引用。
if (((index == 0) && (this.items.Count() == 1))) {
dataGridViewRow.IndexInternal = 0;
dataGridViewRow.StateInternal = this.SharedRowState[0];
if (((this.DataGridView != null))) {
this.DataGridView.OnRowUnshared(dataGridViewRow);
}
return dataGridViewRow;
}
以下是此属性的完整来源(来自反射):
public DataGridViewRow this[int index]
{
get
{
DataGridViewRow dataGridViewRow = this.SharedRow(index);
if (dataGridViewRow.Index != -1)
{
return dataGridViewRow;
}
if ((index == 0) && (this.items.Count == 1))
{
dataGridViewRow.IndexInternal = 0;
dataGridViewRow.StateInternal = this.SharedRowState(0);
if (this.DataGridView != null)
{
this.DataGridView.OnRowUnshared(dataGridViewRow);
}
return dataGridViewRow;
}
DataGridViewRow row2 = (DataGridViewRow) dataGridViewRow.Clone();
row2.IndexInternal = index;
row2.DataGridViewInternal = dataGridViewRow.DataGridView;
row2.StateInternal = this.SharedRowState(index);
this.SharedList[index] = row2;
int num = 0;
foreach (DataGridViewCell cell in row2.Cells)
{
cell.DataGridViewInternal = dataGridViewRow.DataGridView;
cell.OwningRowInternal = row2;
cell.OwningColumnInternal = this.DataGridView.Columns[num];
num++;
}
if (row2.HasHeaderCell)
{
row2.HeaderCell.DataGridViewInternal = dataGridViewRow.DataGridView;
row2.HeaderCell.OwningRowInternal = row2;
}
if (this.DataGridView != null)
{
this.DataGridView.OnRowUnshared(row2);
}
return row2;
}
}
也许你会在下面的文章中找到关于why
的信息(从"使用共享行"开始):
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ha5xt0d9.aspx
当你这样做时:
DataGridViewRow drFirst = new DataGridViewRow();
该行的索引值在drFirst对象中为-1。但当你把它添加到Row集合中时,比如:
DataGridViewRow drFirst = new DataGridViewRow();
行集合根据集合中已存在的行数为其提供一个新索引。在您的情况下,这里的索引为0。
类似地,对于drSecond,当您创建它时,索引值为-1,但当您将它添加到行集合时,索引数值将更改为1。
所以线路:
bool thisSeemsWrong = object.ReferenceEquals(dgv.Rows[dgv.Rows.Count - 1], drSecond);
正在比较具有不同索引值的两个对象,因此它们将不同,因此返回false。但是这条线:
bool thisSeemsRight = object.ReferenceEquals(dgv.Rows[dgv.Rows.Count - 1].Tag, drSecond.Tag);
只是比较一个未更改并返回true的属性Tag。
[更新]
DataGridViewRow drFirst = new DataGridViewRow();
//dgv.Rows.Add(drFirst); //if you comment this line then the thisSeemsWrong is true that's right because it's now comparing the row you add which is drSecond with drSecond
DataGridViewRow drSecond = new DataGridViewRow();
drSecond.Tag = new object();
dgv.Rows.Add(drSecond);
// When drFirst is added this is false - when it isn't this is true (as it should always be?)
bool thisSeemsWrong = object.ReferenceEquals(dgv.Rows[dgv.Rows.Count - 1], drSecond);
DataGridViewRow drFirst = new DataGridViewRow();
dgv.Rows.Add(drFirst); // Now because you have added the first row as drFirst, look what you are comparing against in thisSeemsWrong, you are comparing Row[0] which is drFirst with drSecond which will always be false. You either have to compare Row[1] with drSecond or Row[0] with drFirst??
DataGridViewRow drSecond = new DataGridViewRow();
drSecond.Tag = new object();
dgv.Rows.Add(drSecond);
// When drFirst is added this is false - when it isn't this is true (as it should always be?)
bool thisSeemsWrong = object.ReferenceEquals(dgv.Rows[dgv.Rows.Count - 1], drSecond);