有没有一种有效的方法来执行具有两个变量的选择语句

本文关键字：变量 语句 选择 两个 一种 有效 有没有 方法 执行 | 更新日期: 2023-09-27 17:57:13

在我的 C# 代码中，我需要计算两个非空变量。我制定了一组if-else if语句，但在我看来，它看起来很丑，而且有点太草率了，即使它是正确的。

我查看了 MSDN 库，只看到了基于单个变量进行选择的示例。

有没有一种更清洁、更紧凑的方式来达到相同的结果？

更新：我填写了代码以提供更多上下文。 再看这个，也许我可以直接根据参数操作 linq 查询。但是，我提出的问题是我想关注的通用问题：选择而不是选择后使用的代码。

public ActionResult Index(string searchBy, string orderBy, string orderDir)
{
    var query = fca.GetResultsByFilter(searchBy);
    if (orderBy == "Campus" && orderDir == "Asc")
    {
        query = query = query.OrderBy(s => s.Campus).ThenBy(s => s.Student_Name);
    }
    else if (orderBy == "Campus" && orderDir == "Desc") 
    {
    query = query.OrderByDescending(s => s.Campus);
    }
    else if (orderBy == "Student Name" && orderDir == "Asc")
    {
        query = query = query.OrderBy(s => s.Student_Name);
    }
    else if (orderBy == "Student Name" && orderDir == "Desc")
    {
        query = query.OrderByDescending(s => s.Student_Name);
    }
    else if (orderBy == "Course Count" && orderDir == "Asc")
    {
    query = query.OrderBy(s => s.Course_Count);
    }
    else if (orderBy == "Course Count" && orderDir == "Desc")
    {
    query = query.OrderByDescending(s => s.Course_Count);
    }
}

有没有一种有效的方法来执行具有两个变量的选择语句

您可以在IQueryable上创建一个扩展方法，该方法处理使用 OrderBy 或 OrderByDescending 的排序：

public static class QueryableExtensions
{
    public static IOrderedQueryable<TSource> OrderByWithDirection<TSource,TKey>
        (this IQueryable<TSource> source,
        Expression<Func<TSource, TKey>> keySelector,
        string orderDir)
    {
        return orderDir == "Desc" 
                        ? source.OrderByDescending(keySelector)
                        : source.OrderBy(keySelector);
    }
}

我假设您的GetResultsByFilter方法返回一个IQueryable<>.如果它实际上返回了一个IEnumerable<>，那么扩展方法将需要接受一个IEnumerable<TSource> source参数并返回一个IOrderedEnumerable<TSource>。

然后可以按如下方式使用：

public ActionResult Index(string searchBy, string orderBy, string orderDir)
{
    var query = fca.GetResultsByFilter(searchBy);
    switch (orderBy)
    {
        case "Campus":
            query = query.OrderByWithDirection(s => s.Campus, orderDir);
            break;
        case "Student Name":
            query = query.OrderByWithDirection(s => s.Student_Name, orderDir);
            break;
        case "Course Count":
            query = query.OrderByWithDirection(s => s.Course_Count, orderDir);
            break;
    }
    if (orderBy == "Campus" && orderDir == "Asc")
    {
        // The Campus Asc case was also ordered by Student_Name in the question.
        query = query.ThenBy(s => s.Student_Name);
    }
}

CNot 确定这是否更好，只是不同。

switch (orderDir)
{
    case "Asc":
        Switch (orderBy)
        {
            case "Campus":
                //Code here for Campus orderBy and Asc orderDir
                break;
            case "Student Name":
                //Code here for Student Name orderBy and Asc orderDir
                break;
            case "Course Count":
                //Code here for Course Count orderBy and Asc orderDir
                break;
        }
        break;
    case "Desc":
        Switch (orderBy)
        {
            case "Campus":
                //Code here for Campus orderBy and Desc orderDir
                break;
            case "Student Name":
                //Code here for Student Name orderBy and Desc orderDir
                break;
            case "Course Count":
                //Code here for Course Count orderBy and Desc orderDir
                break;
        }
        break;
}

我会使用三元运算符来使这样更紧凑、更易于阅读。

这也将减少一些布尔检查，因为它不会重复其中任何一个。

    public ActionResult Index(string searchBy, string orderBy, string orderDir)
    {
        var query = fca.GetResultsByFilter(searchBy);
        if (orderBy == "Campus")
        {
            query = (orderDir == "Asc") ? query.OrderBy(s => s.Campus).ThenBy(s => s.Student_Name) :
                query.OrderByDescending(s => s.Campus);
        }
        else if (orderBy == "Student Name")
        {
            query = (orderDir == "Asc") ? query.OrderBy(s => s.Student_Name) : query.OrderByDescending(s => s.Student_Name);
        }
        else if (orderBy == "Course Count")
        {
            query = (orderDir == "Asc") ? query.OrderBy(s => s.Student_Name) : query.OrderByDescending(s => s.Course_Count);
        }
    }

我的看法：

public interface IOrder {
    void perform(Query query)
}
public abstract class AbstractOrder : IOrder {
    protected string orderString;
    public AbstractOrder(string orderString) {
         this.orderString = orderString;
    }
}
public class OrderAsc {
    public OrderAsc(string orderString) : base(orderString) {
    }
    public Query perform(Query query) {
        query = query.OrderBy(s => s.Course_Count); //here you still have to do a mapping between orderString and your db field s.Course_count 
        return query;
    }
}
public class OrderDesc {
    public OrderDesc(string orderString) : base(orderString) {
    }
    public Query perform(Query query) {
        query = query.OrderByDescending(s => s.Course_Count); //here you still have to do a mapping between orderString and your db field s.Course_count, or maybe it's equal, then you can just replace it.
        return query;
    }
}

然后。。。

IList<IOrder> list = new List<IOrder>() {new OrderAsc("Campus"), new OrderDesc("Student Name")}
foreach(IOrder o in list) {
    query = o.perform(query);
}

其中可能有一些错误，我手头没有 IDE 自动取款机。

相关文章：