SqlDependency using BackgroundWorker
本文关键字:BackgroundWorker using SqlDependency | 更新日期: 2023-09-27 18:17:43
我在SQL Server数据库中有一个表,它表示从运行的windows服务插入的一些操作的日志文件。一切正常。
但是,我有一个Windows应用程序,它获得已插入到日志表中的最新行,并在DataGridView
中查看它。在开发这个应用程序时,我依赖于MSDN在Windows应用程序中使用SqlDependency。它工作得很好,但是当日志表接收到大量的日志细节时,Windows应用程序挂起,主线程池变得太忙。
我想通过使用Thread
类或BackgroundWorker
控制在一个分离的线程池中运行前面链接中引用的相同代码。这意味着一个线程用于使用UI控件,另一个线程用于侦听数据库更改并将其放入DataGridView
。
你可以从这个链接看到UI截图"UI"
。(1):此群盒代表用户在监控时可以使用的UI工具。
。(2): Start按钮负责开始侦听和接收来自数据库的更新,并重新填充DataGridView。
。(3):此网格表示已插入数据库的新日志。
。(4):这个数字(38次更改)表示侦听sql依赖项对数据库更改的计数。
我的代码:公共部分类frommain: Form{SqlConnection康涅狄格州;
const string tableName = "OutgoingLog";
const string statusMessage = "{0} changes have occurred.";
int changeCount = 0;
private static DataSet dataToWatch = null;
private static SqlConnection connection = null;
private static SqlCommand command = null;
public frmMain()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private bool CanRequestNotifications()
{
// In order to use the callback feature of the
// SqlDependency, the application must have
// the SqlClientPermission permission.
try
{
SqlClientPermission perm = new SqlClientPermission(PermissionState.Unrestricted);
perm.Demand();
return true;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
private void dependency_OnChange(object sender, SqlNotificationEventArgs e)
{
// This event will occur on a thread pool thread.
// Updating the UI from a worker thread is not permitted.
// The following code checks to see if it is safe to
// update the UI.
ISynchronizeInvoke i = (ISynchronizeInvoke)this;
// If InvokeRequired returns True, the code
// is executing on a worker thread.
if (i.InvokeRequired)
{
// Create a delegate to perform the thread switch.
OnChangeEventHandler tempDelegate = new OnChangeEventHandler(dependency_OnChange);
object[] args = { sender, e };
// Marshal the data from the worker thread
// to the UI thread.
i.BeginInvoke(tempDelegate, args);
return;
}
// Remove the handler, since it is only good
// for a single notification.
SqlDependency dependency = (SqlDependency)sender;
dependency.OnChange -= dependency_OnChange;
// At this point, the code is executing on the
// UI thread, so it is safe to update the UI.
++changeCount;
lblChanges.Text = String.Format(statusMessage, changeCount);
this.Refresh();
// Reload the dataset that is bound to the grid.
GetData();
}
private void GetData()
{
// Empty the dataset so that there is only
// one batch of data displayed.
dataToWatch.Clear();
// Make sure the command object does not already have
// a notification object associated with it.
command.Notification = null;
// Create and bind the SqlDependency object
// to the command object.
SqlDependency dependency = new SqlDependency(command);
dependency.OnChange += new OnChangeEventHandler(dependency_OnChange);
using (SqlDataAdapter adapter = new SqlDataAdapter(command))
{
adapter.Fill(dataToWatch, tableName);
dgv.DataSource = dataToWatch;
dgv.DataMember = tableName;
dgv.FirstDisplayedScrollingRowIndex = dgv.Rows.Count - 1;
}
}
private void btnStart_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
changeCount = 0;
lblChanges.Text = String.Format(statusMessage, changeCount);
// Remove any existing dependency connection, then create a new one.
SqlDependency.Stop("<my connection string>");
SqlDependency.Start("<my connection string>");
if (connection == null)
{
connection = new SqlConnection("<my connection string>");
}
if (command == null)
{
command = new SqlCommand("select * from OutgoingLog", connection);
}
if (dataToWatch == null)
{
dataToWatch = new DataSet();
}
GetData();
}
private void frmMain_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
btnStart.Enabled = CanRequestNotifications();
}
private void frmMain_FormClosing(object sender, FormClosingEventArgs e)
{
SqlDependency.Stop("<my connection string>");
}
}
我想要的是:当用户单击Start按钮时,应用程序在一个分离的线程池中运行代码。
首先,如果我理解得好更改通知已经在另一个线程上执行,那么使用多一个线程层应该是无用的。
实际上,导致应用程序挂起的原因是UI线程上的UI更新。
你能展示负责这个更新的代码吗?
如果有很多通知,视觉更新将更长,你不能做太多:
按块更新网格以平滑更新:不是插入1000条新记录,而是运行100条记录的10次更新,但是如果处理速度不够快,则有被数据淹没的风险
使用像BindingList一样本地处理通知的集合可以帮助
此外,为了增强用户体验,避免令人不快的"它挂起"效果,你可以显示一个进度条或一个简单的转轮。
更新:所以如果GetData函数的第一部分是瓶颈,那么你确实可以使用另一个线程,例如从线程池:
private void GetData()
{
// Start the retrieval of data on another thread to let the UI thread free
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(o =>
{
// Empty the dataset so that there is only
// one batch of data displayed.
dataToWatch.Clear();
// Make sure the command object does not already have
// a notification object associated with it.
command.Notification = null;
// Create and bind the SqlDependency object
// to the command object.
SqlDependency dependency = new SqlDependency(command);
dependency.OnChange += new OnChangeEventHandler(dependency_OnChange);
using (SqlDataAdapter adapter = new SqlDataAdapter(command))
{
adapter.Fill(dataToWatch, tableName);
// Update the UI
dgv.Invoke(() =>
{
dgv.DataSource = dataToWatch;
dgv.DataMember = tableName;
dgv.FirstDisplayedScrollingRowIndex = dgv.Rows.Count - 1;
});
}
});
}
所以在UI线程上运行的唯一部分是更新数据网格。
没有测试,但希望这有助于…
?更新:
使用一些同步来避免并发执行:
AutoResetEvent running = new AutoResetEvent(true);
private void GetData()
{
// Start the retrieval of data on another thread to let the UI thread free
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(o =>
{
running.WaitOne();
// Empty the dataset so that there is only
// one batch of data displayed.
dataToWatch.Clear();
// Make sure the command object does not already have
// a notification object associated with it.
command.Notification = null;
// Create and bind the SqlDependency object
// to the command object.
SqlDependency dependency = new SqlDependency(command);
dependency.OnChange += new OnChangeEventHandler(dependency_OnChange);
using (SqlDataAdapter adapter = new SqlDataAdapter(command))
{
adapter.Fill(dataToWatch, tableName);
running.Set();
// Update the UI
dgv.Invoke(() =>
{
dgv.DataSource = dataToWatch;
dgv.DataMember = tableName;
dgv.FirstDisplayedScrollingRowIndex = dgv.Rows.Count - 1;
});
}
});
}