通过Moq测试表达式树方法,不使用表达式逻辑
本文关键字:表达式 方法 Moq 测试 通过 | 更新日期: 2023-09-27 18:19:58
问题是:直接运行代码会创建正确的筛选,而我的单元测试根本没有进行筛选(返回模拟存储库中的所有记录)。
我不知道在测试中使用表达式逻辑是不是搞砸了什么,但无论我设定了什么标准,模拟存储库都不会被过滤掉,我可以支持"所有"记录。这在服务层调用它时可以100%工作,但在测试中不行。
编辑:很抱歉代码的格式,我再也找不到更好的了。
代码:
public abstract class EFRepository<T> : IRepository<T> where T : BaseEFModel {
public IUnitOfWork UnitOfWork { get; set; }
private IDbSet<T> _objectset;
private IDbSet<T> ObjectSet
{
get { return _objectset ?? (_objectset = UnitOfWork.Context.Set<T>()); }
}
public virtual IQueryable<T> WhereInternal(Expression<Func<T, bool>> expression)
{
return ObjectSet.Where(expression);
} }
实现:
public class DoNotSolicitRepo : EFRepository<DoNotSolicit>, IDoNotSolicitRepo {
private readonly RestUnitOfWork worker;
public DoNotSolicitRepo(RestUnitOfWork _worker)
{
worker = _worker;
}
public IList<DNSContract> SelectWithCriteria(DNS_Search search)
{
// create the where clause
Expression<Func<DoNotSolicit, bool>> whereClause = c => (
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.FirstName) || c.FirstName.StartsWith(search.FirstName)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.LastName) || c.LastName.StartsWith(search.LastName)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Address1) || c.Address1.Contains(search.Address1)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Address2) || c.Address2.Contains(search.Address2)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.City) || c.City.Contains(search.City)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.State) || c.State.Equals(search.State)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Zip5) || c.Zip.Equals(search.Zip5)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Phone) || c.Phone.Equals(search.Phone)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Email) || c.Email.Equals(search.Email))
);
using (var scope = worker)
{
scope.Register(this);
var resultList = WhereInternal(whereClause).ToList();
Mapper.CreateMap<DoNotSolicit, DNSContract>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.PartnerCode, opt => opt.Ignore())
.ForMember(dest => dest.PartnerDescription, opt => opt.Ignore())
.ForMember(dest => dest.DoNotSolicitReason, opt => opt.Ignore())
.ForMember(dest => dest.SaveDate, opt => opt.Ignore())
.ForMember(dest => dest.InsertDT, opt => opt.Ignore());
var returnObj = Mapper.Map<IList<DoNotSolicit>, IList<DNSContract>>(resultList);
return returnObj.FriendlySaveDates();
}
} }
测试:
基本:
public abstract class BaseEFUnitFixture<T> where T : BaseEFModel {
protected Mock<EFRepository<T>> mockedEFRepo = new Mock<EFRepository<T>>();
public Mock<EFRepository<T>> MockedEFRepositiory()
{
var t = new List<T>();
mockedEFRepo.Setup(x => x.AddInternal(It.IsAny<T>())).Callback((T e) => t.Add(e));
mockedEFRepo.Setup(x => x.AddInternal(It.IsAny<List<T>>())).Callback((IList<T> le) => t.AddRange(le));
mockedEFRepo.Setup(x => x.AllInternal()).Returns(t.AsQueryable());
mockedEFRepo.Setup(x => x.WhereInternal(It.Is<Expression<Func<T, bool>>>(y => y != null))).Returns(t.AsQueryable());
return mockedEFRepo;
}
}
实现:
[TestFixture] public class DNSRepoTest : BaseEFUnitFixture<DoNotSolicit> {
private readonly List<DoNotSolicit> list = new List<DoNotSolicit>();
private class Search
{
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public string Address1 { get; set; }
public string Address2 { get; set; }
public string City { get; set; }
public string State { get; set; }
public string Zip5 { get; set; }
public string Phone { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
}
private Expression<Func<DoNotSolicit, bool>> SearchBuilder(Search search)
{
// same as repo logic
Expression<Func<DoNotSolicit, bool>> whereClause = c => (
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.FirstName) || c.FirstName.StartsWith(search.FirstName)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.LastName) || c.LastName.StartsWith(search.LastName)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Address1) || c.Address1.Contains(search.Address1)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Address2) || c.Address2.Contains(search.Address2)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.City) || c.City.Contains(search.City)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.State) || c.State.Equals(search.State)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Zip5) || c.Zip.Equals(search.Zip5)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Phone) || c.Phone.Equals(search.Phone)) &&
(String.IsNullOrEmpty(search.Email) || c.Email.Equals(search.Email))
);
return whereClause;
}
[TestFixtureSetUp]
public void Init()
{
list.Add(new DoNotSolicit
{
DoNotSolicitID = 4,
FirstName = "nunit",
Origination = "testing"
});
mockedEFRepo = MockedEFRepositiory();
mockedEFRepo.Object.AddInternal(list);
}
[Test]
public void SelectWithCriteria_FirstNameMatch()
{
var clause = SearchBuilder(new Search{FirstName = "test"});
var results = mockedEFRepo.Object.WhereInternal(clause).ToList();
Assert.IsNotNull(results);
Assert.IsTrue(results.Count < mockedEFRepo.Object.AllInternal().Count());
Assert.IsTrue(results.Count > 0);
} }
您的方法总体上是错误的。你所做的就是嘲笑你测试的类——这是不正确的。您应该只模拟正在测试的类外部的东西,因为mocking所做的基本上是用空存根的模拟对象替换功能。如果它被模拟了,它就不起作用,或者在配置模拟时起作用。
我看不出你为什么要测试mock类,因为在这种情况下,你测试的不是类功能/代码,而是你配置mock的方式。
很难理解您希望测试方法测试什么代码。我建议进行依赖注入,以分离实际的数据存储库(可以用特定的数据/方法模拟)和包含逻辑的类(比如选择第一个匹配)。在逻辑类的构造函数中传递mocked存储库,并测试它以断言预期的行为。